Gender and CMC Reading List

Happened to find these old exams online, for those who might want to see rhetorical theory sample questions other than the ones I've proposed. Oh, and I'm finally posting the reading list for my specialty area: feminist theory and research on gender and computer-mediated communication. Please excuse the ugly formatting; some citations are in APA, some MLA, sometimes the articles came from coursepacks and not all the publication information is there...it's anarchy!


Aschauer,
A. B. (1999). Tinkering with technological skill: an examination of
the gendered uses of technologies. Computers and Composition,
16, 7-23.







Bizzell, Patricia.
“Feminist Methods of Research in the History of Rhetoric: What
Difference Do They Make?” Feminism and Composition: A
Critical Sourcebook
. Eds. Gesa
E. Kirsch, Faye Spencer Maor, Lance Massey, Lee Nickoson-Massey, and
Mary Sheridan-Rabideau. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2003:
194-205.







Blair,
Kristine, and Pamela Takayoshi, Eds.
Feminist Cyberscapes:
Mapping Gendered Academic Spaces
.
Stamford, CT: Ablex, 1999.







Brown, Wendy. “Wounded
Attachments.”







Butler,
Judith. Gender Trouble.







Comstock,
M. (2001). Grrrl zine networks: re-composing spaces of authority,
gender, and culture. JAC, 21, 383-409.







Gurak, L. (2001).
Cyberliteracy: navigating the Internet with awareness. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.







Hekman, Susan. “Truth
and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” Signs 22.2
(1997): 341-65. (and responses by Hartsock, Collins, Harding, Smith,
Hekman)







Herring,
Susan, Inna Kouper, Lois Ann Scheidt, and Elijah Wright. “Women
and Children Last: The Discursive Construction of Weblogs.”
Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs.
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/women_and_children.html







Hesse-Biber
and Yaiser, “Feminist Approaches to Research as a Process







Jones Royster,
Jacqueline. “A View from a Bridge: Afrafeminist Ideologies and
Rhetorical Studies.” Kirsch, Spencer Maor, Massey,
Nickoson-Massey, and Sheridan-Rabideau: 206-233.







Kirsch,
Gesa E., and Joy S. Ritchie. “Beyond the Personal: Theorizing a
Politics of Location in Composition Research.” Kirsch, Spencer
Maor, Massey, Nickoson-Massey, and Sheridan-Rabideau:
140-56.







LeCourt, Donna, and
Luann Barnes. “Writing Multiplicity: Hypertext and Feminist
Textual Politics.” Kirsch, Spencer Maor, Massey,
Nickoson-Massey, and Sheridan-Rabideau: 321-338.







Mohanty,
Chandra Talpade. “Feminist Encounters: Locating the Politics of
Experience.” Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist
Debates
.







Naples,
Nancy.
Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse
Analysis, and Activist Research
.
New York: Routledge, 2003.







Nicholson,
Linda. “Interpreting
Gender.”







Rickly,
R. (1999). The gender gap in computers and composition research: must
boys be boys?
Computers and Composition, 16, -140.







Schaap,
Frank. “Links, Lives, Logs: Presentation in the Dutch
Blogosphere.”
Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric,
Community, and Culture of Weblogs
.
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/links_lives_logs.html







Scott,
Joan W. “The Evidence of Experience.” Critical Inquiry
17 (Summer 1991): 773-797.







Scott, Joan W. “Gender
as a Category of Analysis.”







Sullivan, Patricia A.
“Feminism and Methodology in Composition Studies.”
Kirsch, Spencer Maor, Massey, Nickoson-Massey, and Sheridan-Rabideau:
124-139.







Takayoshi,
P. (2000). Complicated women: examining methodologies for
understanding the uses of technology. Computers and Composition,
17,
123-138.







Wahlstrom,
B. (1994). Communication and technology: defining a feminist presence
in research and practice. In C. Selfe and S. Hilligoss, (Eds).
Literacy and computers: the complications of teaching and learning
with technology
. (pp. 171-185.) New York: Modern Language
Association.







Wolfe, J.
(1999). Why do women feel ignored? Gender differences in
computer-mediated classroom interactions. Computers and
Composition, 16,
153-166.







Young,
Iris Marion. “Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as
Social Collective.” Signs 19.3 (1994): 158-183.